« Oh, Dear | Main | Ping »

May 26, 2006

OMW as VG?

Here's an interesting commentary/interview with me at the video game site Gaming Target, in which the author chats about how Old Man's War would make a great video game (I agree), and then interviews me about the influence of video games on OMW (there's a little). It's an interesting commentary/interview, made extra cool because the guy who wrote the piece is named "John Scalzo." Man, that's just awesome.

Posted by john at May 26, 2006 11:04 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.scalzi.com/mt2/mt-tb.cgi/3833

Comments

John H | May 26, 2006 11:13 AM

You say Scalzi - I say Scalzo. Let's call the whole thing off...

John H | May 26, 2006 11:18 AM

I work for a mid-size company with fewer than 300 employees. But we had an Ada Lorenzi and an Ada Lorenzo at the same time - I imagine they each got a lot of the other's email by mistake.

Robert Daeley | May 26, 2006 01:19 PM

Now y'all just need to track down John Scalza, John Scalze, John Scalzu, and sometimes John Scalzy. ;)

emeraldcite | May 26, 2006 01:57 PM

Just wanted to send you a little note of thanks for your offer of support to Absolutewrite. It's great to see the writing community working together.

Kevin Q | May 26, 2006 02:25 PM

I'm surprised there's been no move to make the OMW world into a pen-and-paper RPG. You would start with a backstory for your retiree character, and then follow them through the rejuvenation and into the service. Could be an interesting idea.

K

Jeff Porten | May 26, 2006 03:09 PM

Is one of you worth two of him?

Alex S. | May 26, 2006 07:45 PM

Commenting on the interview, on the idea of 'books into games':

It's not all that much of a stretch -- both David Drake's Hammer's Slammers and David Weber's Honorverse have spawned board/miniatures games, and a Hammer's Slammers video game (based roughly on the current miniatures rules, IIRC) was in development for a time (though it's gone the way of the dodo already).

Pat J | May 26, 2006 08:21 PM

Wouldn't the most appropriate comment be OMG? Or perhaps OMGWFTBBQ?

mythago | May 26, 2006 08:43 PM

So he's a single unit of Scalz, whereas you are vast and contain multitudes?

Tom Scudder | May 27, 2006 07:57 PM

So what does BBQ in the OMGWTFBBQ string stand for?

Sean L. | May 28, 2006 11:18 AM

Mmm...the gun idea is spiffy and new, but keep in mind that novels turned into games, especially science-fiction novels, tend to lose whatever it was that make them good (Starship Troopers for one...*shudders*). Even with Orson Scott Card writing a game(Indigo Prophecy), it wasn't that great.

But that's just the critic in me. The gamer would really like to see this happen, actually, with the ability to toggle firing modes on the fly. No bullet time though, that just gets old :D

Pat | May 28, 2006 03:44 PM

So what does BBQ in the OMGWTFBBQ string stand for?

I assume "barbecue"...

zhwj | May 29, 2006 03:24 AM

What'll happen is that sometime in the next iteration of the gaming cycle, some developer-fan will take the basic ideas without purchasing the property, and give you credit by calling the nanobot ammo material "scalzon" or something.

Tom Scudder | May 30, 2006 06:36 AM

ZOMG. It all makes sense now.

Post a comment.

Comments are moderated to stop spam; if your comment goes into moderation, it may take a couple of hours to be released. Please read this for my comment moderation policies.
Preview will not show paragraph breaks. Trust me, they're there.
The proprietor generally responds to commenters in kind. If you're polite, he'll be polite. If you're a jackass, he'll be a jackass. If you are ignorant, he may correct you.
When in doubt, read the comment thread rules.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)