January 07, 2005
The Whatever has a fair share of visitors who are professional writers (and an equally fair share of visitors who could/will be pro writers, when/if the capricious gods of publishing align their stars in the correct configuration), so let me throw this out to y'all:
As most of you know, I'm 35, and I started writing in earnest when I was 14 years old, which, as it happens, is the same time that the original Mac debuted. What this means is that I have never written anything of any appreciable length -- anything -- that I didn't write on a computer (or at the very least, a computerized word processor). As a consequence, my writing process has developed with the word creation and editing capabilities of the computer in mind. Indeed, is tied to it to such an extent that the mere thought of trying to write anything of any length -- more than a few hundred words -- without the aid of a computer fills me with a certain amount of dread and terror.
Nor do I think I'm alone in this -- as I said, I'm 35, which ain't exactly young (not exactly old, either, harumph, harumph, but I'm not, shall we say, any longer in the freshly-spritzed bloom of youth), and there's an entire generation of writers my age (give or take five years) who also have always used the computer as their primary writing tool. Not to mention the entire generation of adults younger than I, who I assume are aware of typewriters, but may never have seen one in actual professional use.
So, writers: Can you honestly imagine trying to write a full-length book or novel (we're talking 60,000+ words) without a computer? Or, for those of you alive and publishing in the terrifying days before computers, can you imagine going back to that? I'm simply curious.
As an aside to this, apart from the pure and simple mechanical issues of writing on a computer, I do wonder to how much my writing style is predicated on my writing tool -- i.e., to what extent my "voice" is due to working on a computer rather than a typewriter or (eeeeeegh) pen and paper. I suspect it's a not insignificant amount, although it would be hard to quantify without actually trying to write something like a novel with another writing tool, and I don't know if my curiosity on the matter extends that far.
Posted by john at January 7, 2005 02:12 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Word Processing:
» Writing Utensils from Tobias S. Buckell Online
Over at Whatever John Scalzi wonders how writing tools affect his style. It's something I've pondered myself, as I'm very much in love with my own writing tools. I do wonder to how much my writing style is predicated on... [Read More]
Tracked on January 10, 2005 10:47 AM
» What we write with... from Various rumblings from a Dink
I'm about half a generation behind John Scalzi (10 years), but I still completely identify with his discussion at Whatever about the changes some people have seen and the stability others of us have enjoyed in terms of writing and wordprocessing in hi... [Read More]
Tracked on January 10, 2005 12:34 PM
» On Word Processing from Greg Writes
John Scalzi is a writer of my generation, professionally published in one of my chosen genres (Science Fiction) and self-published in another (Blogging). Not everyone yet considers blogging to be a genre, but at least I'm on safe ground to... [Read More]
Tracked on January 14, 2005 12:13 AM
» A writer and his tools. from HillCollins.net
I read an interesting post on Tobias S. Buckwell's blog about the relationship between a writer and his tools of the trade. I'm 21, and I've been seriously writing (as in not just for fun or as a hobby) since... [Read More]
Tracked on January 14, 2005 04:33 PM
Post a comment.Comments are moderated to stop spam; if your comment goes into moderation, it may take a couple of hours to be released. Please read this for my comment moderation policies.
Preview will not show paragraph breaks. Trust me, they're there.
The proprietor generally responds to commenters in kind. If you're polite, he'll be polite. If you're a jackass, he'll be a jackass. If you are ignorant, he may correct you.
When in doubt, read the comment thread rules.