« Football With Jesus | Main | I Hate Your Politics Followup »

March 22, 2002

I Hate Your Politics

I hate your politics.

No, I don't know what they are. And no, I probably don't know who you are, either. Really, those two points are immaterial (no offense). As it turns out about, about 46% of you are liberal, 46% of you are conservative, and the rest of you just want your guns, drugs and brothels (here in the US, we call them folks "libertarians").

Each of you carries baggage from your political affiliation, and all of that baggage has a punky smell to it, like one of your larger species of rodent crawled in and expired in your folded underwear. Listening to any of you yammer on about the geopolitical situation is enough to make one want to melt down one's dental fillings with a beeswax candle and then jam an ice pick into the freshly-exposed nerve, just to have something else to think about. It's not so much that politics brings out the worst in people than it is that the worst in people goes looking for something to do, and that usually ends up being politics. It's either that or setting fires in trashcans.

In the spirit of fairness, and of completeness, let me go down the list and tell you what I hate about each major branch of political thinking.

Liberals: The stupidest and weakest members of the political triumvirate, they allowed conservatives to turn their name into a slur against them, exposing them as the political equivalent of the kid who lets the school bully pummel him with his own fists (Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself). Liberals champion the poor and the weak but do it in such condescendingly bureaucratic ways that the po' illedumacated Cleti would rather eat their own shotguns than associate with the likes of them. Famously humorless and dour, probably because for a really good liberal, everything is political, and you just can't joke about things like that.

Defensive and peevish even when they're right. Under the impression that people in politics should play fair, which is probably why they get screwed as often as they do (nb: 2000 Presidential election). Feel guilty about the freedoms their political positions allow them, which is frankly idiotic. Liberals are politically able to have all sorts of freaky mammal sex but typically don't; good liberal foreplay is a permission slip and three layers of impermeable barriers. The only vaguely liberal person we know of who seemed to enjoy sex in the last 30 years is Clinton, and look what he got out of it.

Fractious and have no sense of loyalty; will publicly tear out the intestines of those closest to them at the most politically inopportune times. The attention spans of poultry; easily distracted from large, useful goals by pointless minutiae. Not only can't see the forest for the trees, can't see the trees for the pine needles. Deserve every bad thing that happens to them because they just can't get their act together. Too bad those they presume to stand for get royally screwed as well.

Conservatives: Self-hating moral relativists, unless you can convince me that an intellectual class that publicly praises family values but privately engages in sodomy, coke and trophy wives is more aptly described in some other way. Not every conservative is an old wealthy white man on his third wife, but nearly every conservative aspires to be so, which is a real waste of money, youth, race and women. Genuinely fear and hate those who are not "with" them -- the sort of people who would rather shit on a freshly-baked cherry pie than share it with someone not of their own tribe.

Conservatives believe in a government by the oligarchy, for the oligarchy, which is why the conservative idea of an excellent leader is Ronald Reagan, i.e., genial, brain-damaged and amenable to manipulation by his more mentally composed underlings. Under the impression they own the copyright on Jesus and get testy when other political factions point out that technically Christ is in the public domain. Conservatives don't actually bother to spend time with people who are not conservative, and thus become confused and irritable when people disagree with them; fundamentally can't see how that's even possible, which shows an almost charming intellectual naiveté. Less interested in explaining their point of view than nuking you and everything you stand for into blackened cinders before your evil worldview catches on like a virus. Conservatives have no volume control on their hate and yet were shocked as Hell when Rush Limbaugh went deaf.

Conservatives clueless enough to think that having Condi Rice and Andrew Sullivan on the team somehow counts as diversity. Pen their "thinkers" like veal in think tanks rather than let them interact with people who might oppose their views. Loathe women who are not willing to have their opinions as safely shellacked as their hair. Let their sons get caught with a dime bag and see how many are really for "zero-tolerance." Let a swarthy day laborer impregnate their daughters and find out how many of them are really pro-life.

Libertarians: Never got over the fact they weren't the illegitimate children of Robert Heinlein and Ayn Rand; currently punishing the rest of us for it. Unusually smug for a political philosophy that's never gotten anyone elected for anything above the local water board. All for legalized drugs and prostitution but probably wouldn't want their kids blowing strangers for crack; all for slashing taxes for nearly every social service but don't seem to understand why most people aren't at all keen to trade in even the minimal safety net the US provides for 55-gallon barrels of beans and rice, a crossbow and a first-aid kit in the basement. Blissfully clueless that Libertarianism is just great as long as it doesn't actually involve real live humans.

Libertarians blog with a frequency that makes one wonder if they're actually employed somewhere or if they have loved ones that miss them. Libertarian blogs even more snide than conservative blogs, if that's possible. Socially slow -- will assume other people actually want to talk about legalizing hemp and the benefits of a polyamorous ethos when all these other folks really want is to drink beer and play Grand Theft Auto 3. Libertarianism the official political system of science fiction authors, which explains why science fiction is in such a rut these days. Libertarians often polyamorous (and hope you are too) but also somewhat out of shape, which takes a lot of the fun out of it.

Easily offended; Libertarians most likely to respond to this column. The author will attempt to engage subtle wit but will actually come across as a geeky whiner (Conservatives, more schooled in the art of poisonous replies, may actually achieve wit; liberals will reply that they don't find any of this humorous at all). Libertarians secretly worried that ultimately someone will figure out the whole of their political philosophy boils down to "Get Off My Property." News flash: This is not really a big secret to the rest of us.

I'm guessing you thought I was way off on your political philosophy but right on the button about the other two. Just think about that for a while.

Posted by john at March 22, 2002 08:33 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.scalzi.com/mt2/mt-tb.cgi/2872

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I Hate Your Politics:

» Banter. from Glass House
Jenna and I were talking about the blog this morning. She thinks that I cover the stuff I choose to talk about pretty well (perhaps *too* well -- I seem long-winded even to myself); but she wants to know why I'm not posting more about current events ... [Read More]

Tracked on January 14, 2005 02:32 PM

Comments

Stephen Turcotte | March 5, 2006 09:52 PM

Hi John,

Found you via the Writing Tips for Non-Writers Who Don't Want to Work at Writing.
You certainly do have a way with words. You have an uncanny ability to rip with authority. I believe these tips will help my writing improve and that’s better than continuing to make the same mistakes over and over again.

I started off in business with basically horrible writing skills, but an ability to speak and tell a story. I’ve gotten better over the years, but not from what I learned in school. I got better from writing and needing to write to make sales proposals and business communications. Your tips make a lot of sense for me, and I will recommend them to anyone I know who needs help with their writing – especially the tip about speaking what you write.

Regarding this politically charged post, I can't believe that no one has engaged into an intellectual wrestling match with you; on any of your points. Just in case you’re wondering, you don’t have a fighter here. Basically, I agree with everything you wrote. Does agreement make me a realist, a cynic, or simply an Independent?

I'm just wondering how you would characterize a mild Ralph Nader 2000 supporter? I did not paint my car or anything like that; just a bumper sticker. I still like Nader because he seems to be ready and willing to change politics as usual. People characterize him as crazy, or a liberal, or as a spoiler for Democrats, but I admire what he has done and has tried to do for this country. Too bad more people in this country did not follow him, because I can’t imagine how things would be worse with him vs. the current disaster of a President. Do you think there would there be less corruption, cleaner air, more accountability and less war? Would we be safer as a nation? Look what Nader did with the auto industry. I don’t think he’d leave us any more vulnerable than the puppet GW and his Daddy and Dick have. I guess we’re just going to keep on electing morons until we can’t elect anymore. Maybe we’re already at that point.

Gee, I had no idea I had all these political thoughts until I started writing a comment to your post. I’ll have to send Nader some money now.

Again, thanks for your contributions to those of us who should have listened better in our writing courses. This is a writing sample. If you could, I’d love to get your critique about any writing flaws or bad grammar tendencies, either in a comment or by email to sturcotte at backbonemedia dot com.

joshua corning | March 6, 2006 12:23 AM

I am libertarian and you got only one right...


...the one about the libertarians.

p.s. amazon still hasn't delivered your book yet and I blame you for it.

John Scalzi | March 6, 2006 01:41 AM

Stephen Turcotte:

"I can't believe that no one has engaged into an intellectual wrestling match with you; on any of your points."

They did when it first came out, but I wasn't using this particular blogging software then and didn't have the ability to log comments. So it all happened in e-mail. The piece has since been put into the new software but is so far back in the time stream (four years ago now), that most people don't see it.

Joshua: I accept all blame, naturally. It's all my fault. Everything is.

Doug | April 24, 2006 09:52 PM

Well, if it helps any, I'm a liberal, and you got all three of them pretty much right on the nose.

missC | July 4, 2006 07:39 AM

I know funny liberals and sometimes I am one. They're just not funny about politics: bad enough to have walking jokes running the country, without making jokes about it.

Bruce | September 11, 2006 03:29 PM

There _are_ funny liberals, considerate conservatives, and compassionate libertarians, but you have to admit that they're the exception, not the rule.
I go to Pomona college, and while it's nice that people don't say things like "that's so gay" here, the stifling liberalism can get overwhelming. There's this assumption that everyone shares the same politics, and as long as someone is "on your side," you shouldn't question their reasoning.

Paul | November 4, 2006 01:31 AM

I'm not sure how I found this page but I enjoied the read.I sometimes wonder if there is no such thing as a majority only those who manipulate the best. I wish there were a party called "Other" or the "None of the Above" Party. One thing I am sureofis that a 3rd party can not now really elect a president. Best we can hope for at this time is enough, Congressional Representatives or Senators to sway thebalance and gain power. Ido findit really sad though that I,as a moderate, am being made to feel like a left wing racical by a bunch of theives on an eight year looting frenzy on the people of the US. Nice blog

Paul

john | January 1, 2007 02:57 AM

hey guys,

the only thing which is very necessary in here is that we need good leaders. that good leaders can be and only be sort out from the political parties and let us be a good and responsible citizens in this entire populace by choosing those people who are capable in running down the office.

Geoffrey A. Landis | January 12, 2007 09:39 AM

Hi, John,

I was cleaning up dead links on my "political views" page (www.sff.net/people/geoffrey.landis/politics.html, if you care), noticed that my link to "I Hate Your Politics" had gone 404, and googled around until I found where it moved to. I'm amazed to see that, five years later, you're still getting recently-dated comments! Yow!
Still a great opinion piece, and still funny as hell.

Rich | March 9, 2007 08:22 PM

Found your article from a comment on the Volokh website. Hilarious! And all true. I profess to be a cynic. I'd like to be a libertarian, but as you said above ...
By the way, The Android's Dream made me laugh out loud several times as I read it. That's unusual. Thank you.

Jon R | March 20, 2007 06:59 PM

As a Libertarian I'm flattered. We've not had this much consideration in years! Just to be included in a political party discussion is a coup. Now get off my lawn!

Luke Jackson | April 23, 2007 07:29 PM

Pretty funny stuff. There are a lot of anal-retentive P.C. liberals out there, but what about all the funny people in Hollywood? Larry Flynt is a left-winger, by God.

Post a comment.

Comments are moderated to stop spam; if your comment goes into moderation, it may take a couple of hours to be released. Please read this for my comment moderation policies.
Preview will not show paragraph breaks. Trust me, they're there.
The proprietor generally responds to commenters in kind. If you're polite, he'll be polite. If you're a jackass, he'll be a jackass. If you are ignorant, he may correct you.
When in doubt, read the comment thread rules.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)